CADSeekho · Reference chart

Failure Theories — Which One, and How Safe?

Enter a plane-stress state. See the principal stresses, the factor of safety under each theory, and where your point sits inside the failure envelopes.

Stress state (plane stress)

Tension positive, compression negative. σz = τxz = τyz = 0.

Material

Results

Failure envelopes in the σ₁–σ₂ plane

The dashed load line runs from the origin through your point. Where it crosses an envelope is where that theory predicts failure; FoS = (distance to envelope) ÷ (distance to your point).

Mohr's circle PRO

Convention used: point X = (σx, τxy), point Y = (σy, −τxy); τ plotted positive upward.

Hand calculation — step by step PRO

Which theory should I use?

TheoryMaterialNotes
Distortion energy (von Mises)DuctileBest match to test data for ductile metals. This is the "equivalent stress" FEA tools show by default.
Max shear stress (Tresca)DuctileSlightly conservative (up to ~15% vs von Mises). Simple to calculate by hand.
Max normal stress (Rankine)BrittleOnly safe for brittle materials when stresses have the same sign; unconservative in the mixed quadrant.
Coulomb–Mohr (brittle)BrittleUses different tensile and compressive strengths. Recommended for cast iron in the mixed quadrant.

References: Shigley's Mechanical Engineering Design, Ch. 5; Budynas & Nisbett. Plane stress assumed (third principal stress = 0).